Scientific museums in the Russian Federation, in accordance with current legislation, are switching to the collection management standard developed for the Ministry of Culture. The absolute priority of preserving museum items is a serious obstacle to the implementation of the standard, which greatly limits the possibility of their scientific examination, which is contrary to the interests of scientists. The examination of museum items, like any other use, including exhibiting, inevitably has a negative impact on their preservation. At the same time, the examination serves to increase the value of any item, its relevance for modern culture.

The methodology of scientists’ work with collections began to form in the period of antiquity. In our country, tools for processing, describing, systematizing and storing collections were formed in the 18th–19th centuries, namely in scientific museums, museums of the Academy of Sciences. Museums in the Russian Empire were part of the scientific organization system. However, after the Soviet reforms in the 1930s, museum and scientific activities were radically separated. As a result, the research function of museums under the Ministry of Culture is poorly implemented, which is enshrined in current regulatory documents.

Scientific museums, due to their subordination to the Ministry of Science and Higher Education, have scientific research as their target indicators, which determines their priority over traditional museum indicators (storage and replenishment of funds, exhibits and attracting visitors). Attempts to combine the interests of examining and preserving collections have been discussed for several decades. This problem is especially evident in relation to natural science collections and museums, most of which are under the scientific department. Its solution requires the development of a methodology for handling museum collections and amendments to regulatory documentation.

The article analyzes a collection of minerals and rocks compiled in 1911 in Yekaterinburg city in the mineralogical workshop of the Commission for the Dissemination of Natural Science Knowledge of the Ural Society of Natural Science Lovers, stored in the Museum of Scientific Heritage (Ulan-Ude city). It includes both material (stone samples) and written sources (handwritten and printed). It contains information on the history of science, education and museum work in our country in the first decades of the 20th century. The collection was compiled according to J.D. Dana’s mineralogical systematics, typical for museum practice of that period. Its geography covers mainly the Southern Urals, but individual samples were collected in other regions of the Russian Empire.
The collection box contains its catalog, as well as scraps of the newspaper “Russkoye Slovo” and a fragment of a note of 1911, confirming the dating of the collection. The autograph on the catalogue belongs to Nadezhda O. Sharakshinova, a famous folklorist, through whose family the collection came to Buryatia. A second autograph was presumably left by the Yekaterinburg merchant Pyotr I. Yarinsky (~1868–?).
The educational mineral collections of the Ural Society of Natural Science Lovers were in demand by educational institutions across the country in the first decades of the 20th century. This activity is presented in sufficient detail in archival documents and research works. However, very few such educational aids have survived in museum collections. For the Museum of Scientific Heritage, the collection is an opportunity to expand the mineral diversity and geography of its collection; a document that stands out for its historical, scientific and memorial value.

In December 2025, it will be 200 years since the beginning of the thirty-year reign of Russian Emperor Nicholas I. This period was marked by many events that had a significant impact on the historical development of the country, including the fields of science, education and culture. The article provides a description and characterization of the University Charter (1835); features of the formation and activities of university museums are examined. A comparative characterization of museums focused on natural sciences, technology, and the humanities is presented. Methods of acquiring museum collections through expedition collections, purchases, and donations are discussed. The main forms of university museum activities, namely, research, educational, and outreach, are reflected. The most significant university museums of this period are identified.

2024 marks the 140th anniversary of the beginning of the expeditions of the laboratory of the Botanical Garden of Moscow University under the supervision of Professor Ivan Nikolaevich Gorozhankin to study the Central Russian flora. The historical and scientific context of the studies of this traditional object for the Botanical Garden of Moscow University during the 18th – early 21st centuries is traced. It is shown how the long-term targeted field research by the staff of the laboratory of the Botanical Garden has contributed to a methodologically unified approach to the organization of the program for studying the flora of the Oka River basin allowed not only to expand the territorial coverage, going beyond the purely Moscow region, but also to significant contribute to the development of an important scientific problem, namely, the cognition of the phenomenon of the Oka River flora. Gorozhankin’s principle of systemic research of regional flora was successfully implemented at the end of the 20th century by scientists of the Botanical Garden of Moscow University in the study of the flora of Central Russia.

The article presents the main stages of the scientific path of Ivan A. Heim (Bernhard Andreas von Heim, 1758–1821), a representative of the German academic society, who moved to Russia in 1779 and held the position of the rector of Moscow University from 1808 to 1819. I.A. Heim’s scientific heritage in the field of linguistics, geography and statistics is considered. The great merits of I.A. Heim in the organization of evacuation of Moscow University during the Patriotic War of 1812 and its subsequent restoration are shown.

The reason for writing this article was the off-site meeting of the museology section of the Moscow Society of Naturalists on December 22, 2022, to get acquainted with the exhibition «Past and Present of the Fauna of the Vladimir Region» permanently operating in the House of Culture in Strunino. The initial task of the paper was to analyze the situation with the moving to a new location of the well-known scientific, educational and entertainment museum «Ice Age» in Moscow. The museum was established in 2004 on the basis of the richest paleontological specimens collected by F.K. Shidlovsky National Alliance during multiple expeditions to the northeast of Yakutia, Chukotka, Altai and the Southern Urals. In 2004–2014, the museum functioned as a scientific and exposition center in pavilion No. 71 at the All-Russian Exhibition Center, which not only popularized knowledge about the animals of the Ice Age, but also provided unique exhibits for research by paleontologists. After several years of searching, the creator of the museum finally found a suitable place to accommodate large exhibits. It was necessary to decide how, by continuing the comprehensive educational and research activities, to ensure a wide attendance of the museum in a place remote from Moscow. Thorough studying of the information showed how much the task is broader and more serious than it seemed at first glance. The activity of an outstanding energetic person, devoted to a significant social goal, turned out to be connected with roots deeply rooted in the historical past of the country. Support for a specific undertaking has become important for the implementation of a comprehensive project of the museum, cultural, scientific and educational nature, up to the prospects for the development of the region. And at the same time, the identified problem can be considered as an example of a person’s involvement in the history of the country and responsibility for his/her actions.