«Жизнь Земли» — междисциплинарный научно-практический журнал
Перейти в оглавление выпуска:
Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 45, no 2
Go to the issue table of contents:
Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 45, no 2

Данные статьи

Description

DOI

10.29003/m3451.0514-7468.2023_45_2/233-245

Авторы:

Authors:

Glazyrina, Yu.V., Buzmakov, S.A.

Ключевые слова:

Keywords:

geotourism, geotoponym, geological heritage, paleogeographical heritage, ge-oparks, museum, natural history museum, natural science collection, GSSP

Скачать pdf статьи:

Download the article:

Ссылка для цитирования:

For citation:

Glazyrina, Yu.V., Buzmakov, S.A., «Analysis of geotourism development perspectives based on the geoheritage representation in natural science museums», Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 45, no 2, 233–245 (2023) (in Russ., abstr. in Engl.). DOI: 10.29003/m3451.0514-7468.2023_45_2/233-245.

ANALYSIS OF GEOTOURISM DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES BASED ON THE GEOHERITAGE REPRESENTATION IN NATURAL SCIENCE MUSEUMS

The article analyzes geotourism perspectives based on natural history museums. Significant trends for the integrated development of geotourism and natural history museums are formulated. These trends allow revealing prospective views on the tourist potential of the territory. In order to clarify the geotourism development potential at the place of the Earth’s geochronological key stages, several museums were analyzed in conjunction with the geotoponyms of geological systems in the world. A geoheritage interpretation model, correlating ex situ museums and in situ objects, is developed. It includes territorial aspects and substantive formats of interpretation, depending on the target audience and the format of interaction with geoheritage. Geoheritage evaluation includes three groups of criteria (scientific, educational and geotourism), each being estimated to summarize approaches for the museum representation. The criteria are ranged according to the comparison purpose of in situ and ex situ forms. The variety of geoheritage interpretation forms allows suggesting recommendations for geotourism development. One symbolically significant way is the museumification of in situ and ex situ objects to correlate the museum network and the network of protected areas as a complex tourist infrastructure. For the Perm Region as a historically significant place of the Permian geological system discovery, the priority is to develop a complex plan to integrate the possibilities of geoheritage representation through museum forms and in the natural environment. In view of the objective scientific data, the Perm Region has no GSSP of the Permian system; therefore the role of the “symbolic stratotype” should have the Permian Period Museum as the basic object of the geotourism infrastructure and the starting point of tourist routes. The supportive role in the Permian geoheritage preservation and representation belongs to the network of municipal and university museums.

Список литературы

  1. Amelkina, D.V., “Geography of museums and prospects of the museum tourism development in the Samara region”, Geographical Bull. 1 (56), 133–148 (2021) (in Russian).
  2. Anokhin, A.Yu., Kropinova, E.G., Spiriajevas, E., “Developing geotourism with a focus on geoheritage in a transboundary region: the case of the Curonian Spit”, Balt. Region 13 (2), 112–128 (2021) (in Russian).
  3. Bessarab, D.A., “To the question of using the potential of the Boulder Museum for the development of ecological tourism in urban areas”, Trudy BGTU, Ser. 1, Lesnoe khoz-vo, prirodopol’zovanie i pererab. vozobnovlyaemykh resursov [Proc. of BSTU] 2 (258), 105–108 (2022) (in Russian).
  4. Vdovets, M.S., Informational and methodological basis for the conservation of Russia’s natural heritage. PhD thesis (St. Petersburg: VSEGEI, 2009) (in Russian).
  5. Voronina, Y.N., “Peculiarities of formation of the geographical frame in the development of tourism in specially protected areas”, Ispol’zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov v Rossii 4 (160), 59–67 (2019) (in Russian).
  6. Glazyrina, Y.V., Buzmakov, S.A., “The Permian geoheritage in special protected natural areas and museum collections. Conservation and use”, Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 43 (1), 77–90 (2021) (in Russian).
  7. Glazyrina, Y.V., “Specificity of terminological and legal categories for the geoheritage”, Geology, geography and global energy 3 (86), 65–77 (2022) (in Russian).
  8. Golubchikov, Yu.N., Kruzhalin, V.I., “Geotourism as a new object of study in Earth science”, Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 43 (3), 368–376 (2021) (in Russian).
  9. Kravtsova, L.A., “Сulturological aspects of nature heritage research in the Kemerovo region: forms of its saving and mainstreaming”, Vestnik KemGUKI 52, 83–92 (2020) (in Russian).
  10. Liverovskay, T.Yu., Pikulenko, M.M., “Science and society interaction in natural science museums in USA”, Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 42 (4), 451–464 (2020) (in Russian).
  11. Ruban, D.A., Geology for tourism and hospitality industry professionals (Rostov-on-Don: DSTU-Print, 2018) (in Russian).
  12. Sidorov, I.V., “Geographical aspects of exhibition activities in the Russian oil and gas sector”, Geographical Bull. 2 (61), 34–47 (2022) (in Russian).
  13. Hermitage for the city and citizens. Results of the economic and social contribution of the museum to the life of St. Petersburg (SPb, 2014) (in Russian).
  14. Baczyńska, E., Lorenc, M.W. & Kaźmierczak, U., “The Landscape Attractiveness of Abandoned Quarries”, Geoheritage 10, 271–285 (2018).
  15. Beck L., Joger, U. (eds.), Paleontological Collections of Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The History of Life of Fossil Organisms at Museums and Universities (Springer, 2018).
  16. Benton, M.J., Sennikov, A.G. & Newell, A.J., “Murchison’s first sighting of the Permian, at Vyazniki in 1841”, Proc. of the Geologists’ Association 121, 313–318 (2010).
  17. Crofts, R., “Putting Geoheritage Conservation on All Agenda”, Geoheritage 10, 231‒238 (2018).
  18. Crofts, R., Tormey, D. & Gordon, J.E., “Introducing new guidelines on geoheritage conservation in protected and conserved areas”, Geoheritage 13 (2021).
  19. De Wever, P., Cadet, J-P., Gavillot, Y., Obert, D., McKeever, P., Promenade géologique à l’Unesco (Biotopes Editions, Paris, 2015).
  20. Díaz-Martínez, E., “Typology of heritage: where does geoheritage fit in?”, Forum GeoReg. 23–27 Oct. 2011. P. 102.
  21. Frey, B. & Meier, S., The Economics of Museums. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Elsevier, 2006, 1, 1017–1047).
  22. Haklay, M., “Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation”, Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (2013, p. 105–124).
  23. Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., Jaya-Montalvo, M., “Research Trends in Geotourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Scopus Database”, Geosciences 10 (379), 1–30 (2020).
  24. Hose, T.A., Historical Viewpoints on the Geotourism Concept in the 21st Century. The geotourism industry in the 21st century: the origin, principles, and futuristic approach (Apple Academic Press, 2020, p. 25–27).
  25. Lucas, S.G., Shen, S., The Permian chronostratigraphic scale: history, status and prospectus (London: Geological Society, 2016).
  26. Martini, G., Pagés, J-S. (eds), Actes du premier symposium international sur la protection du patrimoine géologique (Digne-les-Bains, 11–16 juin 1991, Mémoires de la Société géologique de France (nouvelle série), 1994).
  27. Nutman, A.P., Bennett, V.C., Friend, C.R.L., Van Kranendonk, M.J., Sui, D., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M., “Crowdsourcing Geographical Knowledge”, Volunteered Geographic Information in Theory and Practice (Berlin: Springer, 2013).
  28. Pica, A., Reynard, E., Grangier, L., Kaiser, C., Ghiraldi, L., Perotti, L., Monte, M., “GeoGuides, Urban Geotourism Offer Powered by Mobile Application Technology”, Geoheritage 10, 1–16 (2017).

References

  1. Amelkina, D.V., “Geography of museums and prospects of the museum tourism development in the Samara region”, Geographical Bull. 1 (56), 133–148 (2021) (in Russian).
  2. Anokhin, A.Yu., Kropinova, E.G., Spiriajevas, E., “Developing geotourism with a focus on geoheritage in a transboundary region: the case of the Curonian Spit”, Balt. Region 13 (2), 112–128 (2021) (in Russian).
  3. Bessarab, D.A., “To the question of using the potential of the Boulder Museum for the development of ecological tourism in urban areas”, Trudy BGTU, Ser. 1, Lesnoe khoz-vo, prirodopol’zovanie i pererab. vozobnovlyaemykh resursov [Proc. of BSTU] 2 (258), 105–108 (2022) (in Russian).
  4. Vdovets, M.S., Informational and methodological basis for the conservation of Russia’s natural heritage. PhD thesis (St. Petersburg: VSEGEI, 2009) (in Russian).
  5. Voronina, Y.N., “Peculiarities of formation of the geographical frame in the development of tourism in specially protected areas”, Ispol’zovanie i okhrana prirodnykh resursov v Rossii 4 (160), 59–67 (2019) (in Russian).
  6. Glazyrina, Y.V., Buzmakov, S.A., “The Permian geoheritage in special protected natural areas and museum collections. Conservation and use”, Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 43 (1), 77–90 (2021) (in Russian).
  7. Glazyrina, Y.V., “Specificity of terminological and legal categories for the geoheritage”, Geology, geography and global energy 3 (86), 65–77 (2022) (in Russian).
  8. Golubchikov, Yu.N., Kruzhalin, V.I., “Geotourism as a new object of study in Earth science”, Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 43 (3), 368–376 (2021) (in Russian).
  9. Kravtsova, L.A., “Сulturological aspects of nature heritage research in the Kemerovo region: forms of its saving and mainstreaming”, Vestnik KemGUKI 52, 83–92 (2020) (in Russian).
  10. Liverovskay, T.Yu., Pikulenko, M.M., “Science and society interaction in natural science museums in USA”, Zhizn Zemli [Life of the Earth] 42 (4), 451–464 (2020) (in Russian).
  11. Ruban, D.A., Geology for tourism and hospitality industry professionals (Rostov-on-Don: DSTU-Print, 2018) (in Russian).
  12. Sidorov, I.V., “Geographical aspects of exhibition activities in the Russian oil and gas sector”, Geographical Bull. 2 (61), 34–47 (2022) (in Russian).
  13. Hermitage for the city and citizens. Results of the economic and social contribution of the museum to the life of St. Petersburg (SPb, 2014) (in Russian).
  14. Baczyńska, E., Lorenc, M.W. & Kaźmierczak, U., “The Landscape Attractiveness of Abandoned Quarries”, Geoheritage 10, 271–285 (2018).
  15. Beck L., Joger, U. (eds.), Paleontological Collections of Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The History of Life of Fossil Organisms at Museums and Universities (Springer, 2018).
  16. Benton, M.J., Sennikov, A.G. & Newell, A.J., “Murchison’s first sighting of the Permian, at Vyazniki in 1841”, Proc. of the Geologists’ Association 121, 313–318 (2010).
  17. Crofts, R., “Putting Geoheritage Conservation on All Agenda”, Geoheritage 10, 231‒238 (2018).
  18. Crofts, R., Tormey, D. & Gordon, J.E., “Introducing new guidelines on geoheritage conservation in protected and conserved areas”, Geoheritage 13 (2021).
  19. De Wever, P., Cadet, J-P., Gavillot, Y., Obert, D., McKeever, P., Promenade géologique à l’Unesco (Biotopes Editions, Paris, 2015).
  20. Díaz-Martínez, E., “Typology of heritage: where does geoheritage fit in?”, Forum GeoReg. 23–27 Oct. 2011. P. 102.
  21. Frey, B. & Meier, S., The Economics of Museums. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (Elsevier, 2006, 1, 1017–1047).
  22. Haklay, M., “Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation”, Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (2013, p. 105–124).
  23. Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., Jaya-Montalvo, M., “Research Trends in Geotourism: A Bibliometric Analysis Using the Scopus Database”, Geosciences 10 (379), 1–30 (2020).
  24. Hose, T.A., Historical Viewpoints on the Geotourism Concept in the 21st Century. The geotourism industry in the 21st century: the origin, principles, and futuristic approach (Apple Academic Press, 2020, p. 25–27).
  25. Lucas, S.G., Shen, S., The Permian chronostratigraphic scale: history, status and prospectus (London: Geological Society, 2016).
  26. Martini, G., Pagés, J-S. (eds), Actes du premier symposium international sur la protection du patrimoine géologique (Digne-les-Bains, 11–16 juin 1991, Mémoires de la Société géologique de France (nouvelle série), 1994).
  27. Nutman, A.P., Bennett, V.C., Friend, C.R.L., Van Kranendonk, M.J., Sui, D., Elwood, S., Goodchild, M., “Crowdsourcing Geographical Knowledge”, Volunteered Geographic Information in Theory and Practice (Berlin: Springer, 2013).
  28. Pica, A., Reynard, E., Grangier, L., Kaiser, C., Ghiraldi, L., Perotti, L., Monte, M., “GeoGuides, Urban Geotourism Offer Powered by Mobile Application Technology”, Geoheritage 10, 1–16 (2017).